WHEN YOUR DOCTOR SUGGESTS REGULAR MAMMOGRAMS, THIS IS WHAT YOU NEED TO SAY BACK

Today in this article we read the text as video transcript of the interview with Dr. Ben Johnson entitled Mammograms Breast Cancer Cause:

Dr. Ben Johnson: I wrote a book for women, The Secret of Health Breast Wisdom because we, as a medical society, are giving women breast cancer with our demanding that they get mammograms. Mammograms cause breast cancer. Period. So mammograms are not healthy for women. Women should not be getting routine mammograms. That’s crystal clear, published in the peer review literature.

And yet today, if a woman went to her gynecologist or family doc, she would have this shoved down her throat, extreme coercion to go get this mammogram that is causing breast cancer. It’s not saving lives. You have a 4% increased risk of dying if you get mammograms, period.

Ty Bollinger: So the detection technique that we’re using, the primary technique that we use to detect breast cancer, is causing breast cancer.

Dr. Ben Johnson: Absolutely, it’s a terrible test; you know smashing women’s breasts and then irradiating with cancer-causing radiation.  And then it’s so insensitive. For women under 50, it’s only like 52% effective, sensitive. That means 52 is pretty close to 50, right?

Ty Bollinger: Yeah.

Dr. Ben Johnson: It can be said that half of women who have breast cancer, it will not find cancer. It is a terrible test. So there are much better tests. And yet this is what is still housed today heads down women. Terrible test causes breast cancer.

Ty Bollinger: And it doesn't detect, it detects 50% and causes cancer. You said there were better options. What better options are there for detecting breast cancer?

Dr. Ben Johnson: There are two much better options. If you have a lump, if you think you have something, ultrasound is great. This is a test of anatomy. Mammograms are tests of anatomy. Ultrasound tests of anatomy. MRIs are tests of anatomy. So if you've already got a lump, you want to test anatomy.

So, that would be like an ultrasound because they can see the lump, they can see its consistency. They can see where there’s calcium in it. And they can look at blood flow because tumors are going to have increased blood flow. So, for instance, a sensitivity of ultrasound is up around 80%. It’s much higher than mammograms. And the sensitivity is higher too.

But if you are looking for prevention, if we talk about screening, there is really only one device there and it's thermography. Infrared thermal camera. Nothing touches lady. Nothing breaks her chest. No cancer causing radiation.

As we sit here, we are omitting heat in the spectrum called infrared. There’s infrared, visual, and ultraviolet. So this is the infrared spectrum of light, which our eyes don’t see, but which is very detectable by the camera. The military developed this so that they could see people sneaking at them at nighttime and so that they could shoot down missiles and things because they’re producing heat.

Ty Bollinger: Sure, like night vision goggles.

Dr. Ben Johnson: There you go. Night vision goggles are infrared goggles. So we use it as a medical application to detect hotspots in the breast.

Well long before there was a tumor there, there were cancer cells. Probably 8 to 10 years before there was a tumor, there were cancer cells starting to grow. Two cells, four cells, 16 cells, 144 cells, etc. It takes about eight years until you get to about a centimeter in size for a mammogram or an ultrasound to detect it. Well that’s too late. Because that one-centimeter tumor, about five-sixteenths of an inch, less than half an inch, is about one billion cells.

When you get to one billion cells, the cancer has already eroded into the lymphatic system and the venous system and it’s shedding cancer cells all through the body. So that’s why mammograms—one of the many reasons mammograms don’t save lives, it is NOT early detection. That’s one of the little lies they’ve propagated along. “Early detection saves lives. Get your mammogram today. ”

Ty Bollinger: Right.

Dr. Ben Johnson: This statement is correct. Early detection does save lives. It's just that mammography is early detection; it is too late.  And then cancer-causing radiation. So the long and short is that it causes more cancer with mammograms than disclosure.

Source: collectiverevolution.co